Search Icon

Ontario Labour Relations Board

  • Trustfeed ratings Icon
  • Trustfeed ratings Icon
  • Trustfeed ratings Icon
  • Trustfeed ratings Icon
  • Trustfeed ratings Icon

Toronto, Canada

olrb.gov.on.ca
City courthouse

Ontario Labour Relations Board Reviews | Rating 2.2 out of 5 stars (5 reviews)

Ontario Labour Relations Board is located in Toronto, Canada on 505 University Ave #2. Ontario Labour Relations Board is rated 2.2 out of 5 in the category city courthouse in Canada.

Address

505 University Ave #2

Phone

+1 4163267500

Accessibility

Wheelchair-accessible entrance

Open hours

...
Write review Claim Profile
L

Luciano Capone

Employees: Do not fear when your employee tries to review a ministry of labour’s decision. I would urge you to allow the OLRB to make their decision in the matter! Do not let your employers lawyer strong arm you with a lesser amount owed to you! Do not be open to settling! It is your money owed to you no one should rob you and give you less! The OLRB is fair and very practical they have common sense! Most of the people giving bad reviews are employers! Know your rights and if you aren’t sure contact a lawyer and they will be realistic with you, but you don’t need a lawyer it’s your employer who would need one! If you aren’t computer friendly ask a friend or like i said hire a lawyer they will make sure everything is done correctly!

R

Ramandeep Singh

It's better to solve at your own instead of filling case in OLRB. Otherwise wait for the decision till the end of your life. It took over 1 year for me to get the decision and still made a baised decision at the end. Mediator all the times are on vacation whenever sent the emails. Good luck for people filing cases here.

V

V H

The OLRB Vice Chair had interrupted the ongoing negotiation between the parties, did not disclose all case files to the applicant, did not provide any reason for his deliberate omissions of evidences presented by the applicant, distorted the facts, and decided to close the file without hearing. [1] The tribunal did NOT comply with its legislative mandate; [2] The tribunal’s process was NOT administratively fair; [3] The tribunal’s decision was NOT based on the evidence before it; and [4] The tribunal did NOT give adequate reasons in support of its decision. It is very alarming to see the apparent lack of fair, equitable, and functioning justice system in Ontario.

A

Abby Bae

Bias decision reports clearly defraud the public’s right in knowing the truth. Matthew R Wilson is unfair as a mediator and a closed minded adjudicator. He engages in conduct that exploits his position of authority. Matthew is also known to be aggressive and rush matters taking advantage to formulate events. At one point he withholds details of the hearing in regards to certain events and at other points he adds unnecessary details in the decision reports. It debases the very essence of equality and fairness. This gives him every incentive to be bias when exercising his personal preferences towards a party upon awarding or dismissing a case. Taking advantage and constantly exercising that power without a shred of consequence extends his limits to be prone to exaggeration. In some cases he has demonstrated this very well at mediations, hearings and in decision reports. Regardless of the questions and answers at the hearing he simply can withhold or limit information when disclosing the decision reports. This smothers the meaningful process of a fair hearing. Mathew has threatened the integrity of the Tribunal and its processes. It is important to plumb the depths of his way in conducting hearings and decision reports. To ensure no one is subject of any bias decisions it is best to avoid allowing him to mediate a case or conduct a hearing. Matthew was never paid to raise suspicion.

H

Hannah Ann

Matthew R Wilson has an inferiority complex that is fully justified. He lives in his own fantasy world when writing decision reports which are quite the imagination. He is in no condition to mediate any case and definitely shouldn't adjudicate. His tanscripts are not disclosed so he freely and selectively adds/withholds information in the decision report to favour a party of his preference. (Toss him a bone and watch the dog do tricks) He needs years of serious therapy Judging by where he came from he didn't have a smooth history either. The public servant is well beyond serious issues.

Top 10 companies in City courthouse category

Close